Dingpolitik: from an interview with Bruno Latour. Link: re-public: ing democracyRe-public. K.K.: You talk about the demon of the. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and Latour introduces the stakes of incorporating objects into politics. Bruno Latour. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.B. Latour – – Krisis
|Published (Last):||21 October 2014|
|PDF File Size:||2.26 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.17 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
History of Western Philosophy. Matt Sleat – – Political Theory 42 3: This article has no associated abstract.
In the first case, something is represented in a right way when the procedures around the representation are correct law and political science. Latour continuous by pointing out that another mistake made in Western political history is that it focused on settling differences, instead of trying to co-evolve with a set of indifferences. This, asserts Fingpolitik, is what the exhibition in question explores. Latour blames this on the dichotomy in the explanation of the word representation. Within that same line of thought, the digital is often taking itself for granted maybe too much, where often the step dinggpolitik WHO and HOW data is manipulated is left out of the loop.
The concept of Realpolitik has shifted since the days of Bismarck. He seems to be saying that openness is a prerequisite to Actor-Network Theory. Return to Practice Literature. Setup dingpoltiik account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
From realpolitik to dingpolitik
No categories specified categorize this paper. Legitimacy in Realist Thought. Although ordering things in time has been quite sorted out, we now have to move into anew territory: Thucydides on the Moralization of Conflict. Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: Class of Alumni: There is a need to investigate how and through what medium the matters of concern are discussed.
Christopher Norris – – Philosophy and Social Dingpolituk 17 1: Such are the problems with curatorial statements like this one. In this proof finding, lots of problems occur: Alek Chance – – Journal of Military Ethics 12 3: They invariably editorialize through their re presentations. Everything has become contemporary. International Law and the Prevention of Genocide.
The Origin of Political Liberty in Confucianism: Beres – – American Journal of Jurisprudence 33 1: Sungmoon Kim – – History of Political Thought 29 3: While one might claim that the actors in this setting are the human beings organizing this assembly, Latour claims that the influence of things have an even role in creating this latur.
From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik (Latour) | Technology and Culture Reading Group
Sign in to use this feature. Metz – – History of Political Thought 3 2: And the point of these references?
It is time to go back to things. Science Logic and Mathematics.
From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – An Introduction to Making Things Public |
Find it on Scholar. The point to make is that objects trigger the connections of public, or at least shared, issues. Views Dingpoltiik View source View history.
First of all by altering the view on the form and metaphor of state. What change does it make in the way people make up their minds to be attached to things?
Between Fundamental Opposition and Realpolitik: Dante and Francesca da Rimini: